Nasa alien news 2014 series#What Dietrich saw in the sky 16 years ago started a series of events that changed the discussion about unidentified aerial sightings forever. officials are now posing that same question. “Then, of course, there’s that underlying sense of urgency that we all have: Is this a threat to national security?”Ī number of U.S. “We were ridiculed and mocked by so many, so now it feels nice to have people ask good questions and to have them really be interested in getting to the bottom of it,” says Alex Dietrich, a former Navy pilot who observed a UAP in 2004. The UAP Task Force considered conventional explanations for the sightings, such as natural atmospheric phenomena, misidentified civilian aircraft, and radar malfunction-but except for one report that they attributed to a deflating balloon, the investigators “currently lack sufficient information in our dataset to attribute incidents to specific explanations.” The uncertainty leaves stranger and more disturbing theories to be considered, such as “foreign adversary systems” and what the report refers to as “a catchall ‘other’ bin.”Įven without answers, the report is a welcome validation for those in the military who witnessed unknown objects in the sky. Nasa alien news 2014 zip#Recorded on an F/A-18 fighter jet's gun-mounted infrared camera, the object appears to zip across the surface of the ocean as witnesses cry out in amazement over the radio. Navy aviators encountered an unidentified flying object, nicknamed “Go-Fast,” over the Atlantic coast of Florida in 2015. The most famous UAP encounters in modern aviation history-cases from 2004, 2014, and 2015 that involve pilot sightings, radar tracking, and objects caught on video-remain unsolved. “We were unable to confirm, however, that these systems accounted for any of the UAP reports we collected.” “Some UAP observations could be attributable to developments and classified programs by U.S. The report does state that the UAP Task Force was not able to attribute any of the sightings to American military or other advanced U.S. Strange flying objects with seemingly bizarre aerodynamic abilities have been spotted by pilots, on radar, and with infrared sensors. The report, which includes a classified section available only to lawmakers, details the results of investigations by the Defense Department’s UAP Task Force, established in 2017. government is taking the mysterious sightings seriously. The new moniker is Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon, or UAP-a name change meant to signal that the U.S. There’s no evidence that the objects were sent by space aliens, but the report, mandated by Congress as part of the 2021 National Intelligence Authorization Act, confirms that the sightings remain “unidentified.”īut no one in the intelligence community uses the term UFO anymore. No, the Pentagon doesn’t know what they are. government personnel that occurred between 20. Yes, Navy pilots and other military personnel have been seeing mysterious flying objects for decades a Navy task force reviewed 144 sightings by U.S. And while the report, produced by the office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), does provide some new information about the inexplicable occurrences, it leaves many of the biggest questions unanswered. national security officials today delivered a report to Congress about investigations into a series of unidentified flying object sightings, a landmark sign that this previously fringe topic has gained mainstream acceptance. “It would be a big undertaking,” he said, “but we’re going to look at it in extreme depth because the possibility of getting the first piece of interstellar material is exciting enough to check this very thoroughly and talk to all the world experts on ocean expeditions to recover meteorites.U.S. Siraj told Vice that he’s also looking into searching the ocean floor near Papua New Guinea for fragments of the (potentially) interstellar object. Looking ahead: The Harvard astronomers plan to resubmit their paper on the meteor to the journal that rejected it. During five seconds you can do a lot, in terms of instrumentation and measurement.” “It’s not the duration that matters - it’s the quality of the data that was assembled that matters. “Five seconds is plenty of time,” Loeb said. “The possibility of getting the first piece of interstellar material is exciting enough to check this very thoroughly.” Amir Siraj “Although it is of high velocity, a velocity that could be potentially interstellar, it is next to impossible to confirm that it’s interstellar without accompanying data - from a longer data span or data from other sources, which doesn’t exist in this case,” he continued. “Quite frankly, we can’t confirm that it’s interstellar,” Lindley Johnson, NASA’s planetary defense officer, told the New York Times.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |